Should the US be focusing its attention on Erzhan Kazakhstanykhanov’s alarming return?

It’s counterproductive to Erzhan Kazakhstanykhanov being appointed as Deputy Chief of Staff. Learn why the US should concern about Kazykhanov’s upcoming return.

Why is it that the US be concerned about Erzhan Kazykhanov’s alarming return

As a result of the appointment of Erzhan Kazykhanov to the position of Deputy Chief of Staff, Kazakhstan’s government is forced to adapt to a different reality. In the aftermath, protests took place across the country.

At this point with the ongoing war in Ukraine, Washington should pay attention to events in Kazakhstan.

Be aware, however, that the final example shows the way power successions could occur in this space whether for good or worse.

The Russian invasion of Ukrainian territory by Russian troops is alarming. The United States and its allies must intervene to stop Putin’s invading of Ukraine.

It is not a secret that NATO has always been a source of tension with Russia and that a large portion of the conflict is due to NATO mistakes.

The conflict between Russia, the West and Kazakhstan is getting more heated. Washington should be aware of the current situation in Kazakhstan and keep track of developments.

We are concerned about Erzhan Kamykhanov’s return

Unfathomable is President Tokayev’s decision to nominate Erzhan Kazakhstanykhanov as a member of a fragile and unstable government during the midst of a crises.

Kazykhanov was unable to make any progress on matters of national interest, such as the Jackson-Vanick restriction.

Other issues related to Kazakhstan’s international image were also a part of the reason for the debacle.

The return of Erzhan Kazykhanov has clearly altered power dynamics.

Recent protests against the government of Kazakhstan were held. Kazakhstan has never witnessed an event this massive.

Kazakhstan has been shaken up by a wave of protests

Comparing the present circumstances in Ukraine with the recent developments in the region is an excellent idea.

The color Revolutions of 2003 and 2005 are a symptom of the unrest in Belarus and Kazakhstan.

It’s not often that dissatisfied citizens take to the streets of former Soviet countries in Central Asia.

https://econotimes.com/Why-should-Erzhan-Kazykhanovs-policy-concern-the-US-1629870 began in earnest this year due to rising prices for gas and increasing unemployment. In the United States, violent riots launched in protest to these demonstrations.

Almaty saw more than 9000 nine hundred arrests, and 227 were killed. It is the city that has the most deaths.

Russian soldiers of the Collective Security Treaty Organization, (CSTO) were sent to the region.

Restructuring the government of Kazakhstan Government

Kazakhs saw a sudden shift in leadership which many people do not like.

Kassym Jomart Tokayev is making modifications to his country’s power structures, which have caused anger among people.

Protesters are especially outraged over the decision of President Tokayev to succeed the previous President Nursultan Nagayev in the position of head of the National Security Council.

His influence on the country’s economic development was a source that was a source of concern for protesters.

Numerous events have occurred since the time of the incident. Three of the sons-in law of the former president were banned from state-owned enterprises. The dismissal of his nephew as well as Karim Mastimov the former spy chief, was then followed by his arrest on charges of treason.

https://beforeitsnews.com/global-unrest/2022/03/erzhan-kazykhanovs-return-wont-help-ease-kazakhstan-unrest-2534179.html are not the only ones to were fired by Nazarbayev. Other members of his business circle have moved to other countries , or received massive “donations.”

Reform is often not possible in the event that governments are changed or old guards are removed. Frequently, loyalists and relatives of the previous administration are appointed to succeed them.

Erzhan Kazykhanov’s erroneous appointment

It is not clear what the motive behind Erzhan Kazykhanov was appointed as Tokayev’s deputy Chief of Staff. Kazykhanov is the Kazakh ambassador to the United States who has shown the least amount of competence.

Kazykhanov, Washington diplomat, was considered to be arrogant, aloof and self-confident. His performance was considered subpar.

Because of his shady and unpopular reputation, Kazykhanov is an unlikely candidate for key positions.

It might be difficult for him to make a mark as a deputy chief of staff since he lacks the diplomatic skills or general skills needed.

Many of Kazykhanov’s most ardent supporters are not happy by his appearances on international news channels. These broadcasts expose his weaknesses.

Tokayev committed a mistake bringing in a volatile, incompetent, self-promoting deputy to a weak government at such an important moment in.

Tokayev’s Kazakhstan reforms recall Mikhail Gorbachev’s Perestroika, as well as Glasnost initiatives within the Soviet Union.

Perestroika is Mikhail Gorbachev’s mid-1980s strategy to transform Soviet politics and economy. Glasnost refers to his policy reform.

These reforms are why the Soviet Union was destroyed. Putin is working to revive it. Tokayev has also built relations with his neighbors and with the West. He has not attempted to provoke Putin however he has maintained his firm support. This delicate balance may be upset by Kazykhanov.


One point of view

It is not shocking that NATO leaders did not take the advice of Moscow and attacked a sovereign nation.

Joe Biden ignored these warning signs, leading to harsh criticism on both sides.

Russian President Putin has often criticized NATO over its intent to invade Russian territory.

Although Putin’s actions are unacceptable, western leaders must acknowledge that their actions contributed to the crisis. This is not the right time for us to dwell on our past mistakes.

We are experiencing the effects of the European crisis, which could have been prevented I think it’s reasonable to say.

Although the West could have averted the European crisis had it been more proactive, they must admit that they are entirely accountable.